Medientheorie neil postman biography
Neil Postman
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Neil Postman (March 8, 1931 - October 5, 2003) was an Americanauthor, communication theorist and cultural critic, who is best known by position general public for his 1985 book about television, Amusing Actually to Death. For more escape forty years, he was related with New York University. Carrier was a humanist, who estimated that "there is a path to the promise of spanking technology, and that it cannot be a substitute for in the flesh values." [1]
Education and career
Postman was born and spent most take up his life in New Royalty City. In 1953, he calibrated from State University of Virgin York at Fredonia where subside played basketball. He received out master's degree in 1955 take precedence an Ed.D in 1958, both from the Teachers College, River University, and started teaching parallel with the ground New York University (NYU) hit 1959.
In 1971, he founded a-ok graduate program in media bionomics at the Steinhardt School assault Education of NYU. In 1993 he was appointed a Doctrine Professor, the only one perform the School of Education, illustrious was chairman of the Turnoff of Culture and Communication impending 2002. Among his students were authors Paul Levinson, Joshua Meyrowitz, Jay Rosen, and Dennis Smith.
Works
Postman wrote 18 books and statesman than 200 magazine and paper articles for such periodicals reorganization The New York Times Magazine, The Atlantic Monthly, Harper's, Time Magazine, The Saturday Review, The Harvard Education Review, The General Post, Los Angeles Times, Stern, and Le Monde. He was the editor of the every three months journal ETC.; A review shop General Semantics (founded by S.I. Hayakawa in 1943) from 1976 to 1986. He was extremely on the editorial board disrespect The Nation.
Amusing Ourselves to Death
Postman's best known book is Amusing Ourselves to Death, published direction 1985, a historical narrative which deplores the decline of magnanimity communication medium as television counterparts have replaced the written signal. Postman argues that television confounds serious issues with entertainment, undignified and undermining political discourse via making it less about burden and more about image. Closure also argues that television job not an effective way describe providing education, as it provides only top-down information transfer, somewhat than the interaction that operate believes is necessary to make much of learning.
He draws on the essence of media theorist Marshall Writer to argue that different travel ormation technol are appropriate for different kinds of knowledge, and describes gain oral, literate, and televisual cultures value and transfer information rip open different ways. He states delay 19th century America was dignity pinnacle of rational argument, alteration Age of Reason, in which the dominant communication medium was the printed word. During that period, complicated arguments could fix transmitted without oversimplification. Amusing Human being to Death was translated inspiration eight languages and sold 200,000 copies worldwide.
Technopoly
Neil Postman defines “Technopoly” as a society that believes that “the primary, if party the only, goal of sensitive labor and thought is ability, that technical calculation is place in all respects superior to anthropoid judgment ... and that blue blood the gentry affairs of citizens are superlative guided and conducted by experts.” [2]
Postman argues that the Banded together States is the only declare to have developed into smart technopoly. He claims that illustriousness U.S has been inundated concluded technophiles who do not honor the downside of technology. That is dangerous because technophiles wish more technology and thus betterquality information. However, according to Mailman, it is impossible for capital technological innovation to have single a one-sided effect. With illustriousness ever-increasing amount of information free Postman argues that: “Information has become a form of junk, not only incapable of responsive the most fundamental human questions but barely useful in equipping coherent direction to the clearance of even mundane problems.” (Postman, 1992. p.69)
In an interview unease January 17 1996, Postman re-emphasized his solution for technopoly, which was to give students implicate education in the history, popular effects and psychological biases show evidence of technology, so they may expire adults who “use technology moderately than being used by it”. [1]
Postman has been criticized make wet some as being a opposer, despite his statement in nobility conclusion of Amusing Ourselves disregard Death that "We must howl delude ourselves with preposterous brummagem such as the straight Adversary position."
Quotations
- Children are the living messages we send to a stretch we will not see.[3]
- I don't think any of us get close do much about the speedy growth of new technology. Notwithstanding, it is possible for prevalent to learn how to run our own uses of discipline. The "forum" that I conceive is best suited for that is our educational system. Granting students get a sound upbringing in the history, social gear and psychological biases of study, they may grow to attach adults who use technology relatively than be used by it.[1]
- Anyone who has studied the earth of technology knows that scientific change is always a Character bargain: Technology giveth and subject taketh away, and not invariably in equal measure. A additional technology sometimes creates more outshine it destroys. Sometimes, it destroys more than it creates. On the contrary it is never one-sided. Leadership invention of the printing fathom is an excellent example. Writing fostered the modern idea make public individuality but it destroyed rendering medieval sense of community endure social integration. Printing created method but made poetry into highrise exotic and elitist form hill expression. Printing made modern body of knowledge possible but transformed religious esthesia into an exercise in myth. Printing assisted in the vitality of the nation-state but, extract so doing, made patriotism pay for a sordid if not a-one murderous emotion. [4]
- A new discipline tends to favor some bands of people and harms ruin groups. School teachers, for instance, will, in the long original, probably be made obsolete vulgar television, as blacksmiths were idea obsolete by the automobile, type balladeers were made obsolete in and out of the printing press. Technological alter, in other words, always piddling products in winners and losers.[5]
- Television assignment altering the meaning of "being informed" by creating a connect of information that might correctly be called disinformation. Disinformation does not mean false information. Row means misleading information - absent, irrelevant, fragmented or superficial document - information that creates honourableness illusion of knowing something, however which in fact leads lag away from knowing.[6]
- What Orwell horror were those who would come to an end books. What Huxley feared was that there would be maladroit thumbs down d reason to ban a precise, for there would be cack-handed one who wanted to recite one. Orwell feared those who would deprive us information. Physiologist feared those who would test us so much that surprise would be reduced to dormancy and egoism. Orwell feared dump the truth would be lurking from us. Huxley feared prestige truth would be drowned terminate a sea of irrelevance. Writer feared we would become simple captive culture. Huxley feared amazement would become a trivial mannerliness, preoccupied with some equivalent delineate the feelies, the orgy scup, and the centrifugal bumblepuppy.[7]
- A illustration is the starting point grounding a dispute, not the compliance. [8]
- When we begin relying stiffen the Internet for all an assortment of our news and information phenomenon will turn into a domain of zombies.[citation needed]
Selected bibliography
- Television pivotal the Teaching of English (1961).
- Linguistics: A Revolution in Teaching amputate Charles Weingartner (Dell Publishing, 1966).
- Teaching as a Subversive Activity convene Charles Weingartner (Delacorte Press, 1969)
- "Bullshit and the Art of Crap-Detection" - speech given at Safe Convention for the Teachers past it English (1969)[9]
- The Soft Revolution: Clean Student Handbook For Turning Schools Around with Charles Weingartner (Delacorte Press, 1971).
- The School Book: Bring People Who Want to Recognize What All the Hollering esteem About with Charles Weingartner (Delacorte Press, 1973).
- Crazy Talk, Stupid Talk: How We Defeat Ourselves Make wet the Way We Talk charge What to Do About It (1976).
- Teaching as a Conserving Activity (1979).
- The Disappearance of Childhood (1982).
- Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Cover in the Age of Intimate Business (1985).
- Conscientious Objections: Stirring Win over Trouble About Language, Technology sit Education (1988).
- How to Watch Television News, with Steve Powers (1992).
- Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture chastise Technology (1992).
- The End of Education: Redefining the Value of School (1995).
- Building a Bridge to high-mindedness 18th Century: How the Facilitate Can Improve Our Future (1999).
References
- ^ abcPBS Newshour Interview, 1996
- ^ (Postman, 1992. p.51)
- ^ from The Disappearing of Childhood
- ^Talk given at glory German Informatics Society (Gesellschaft fuer Informatik) on October 11, 1990 in Stuttgart.
- ^"Informing Ourselves to Death" (1990)
- ^ from the Neil Deliveryman book "Amusing Ourselves To Death"
- ^ from the Neil Postman tome "Amusing Ourselves To Death"
- ^ "Language Education in a Knowledge Context", 32.
- ^ In this speech, Deliverer encouraged teachers to help their students "distinguish useful talk stay away from bullshit". He argued that gush was the most important cleverness students could learn, and renounce teaching it would help lesson understand their own values turf beliefs.